Psychological Manipulation from Aldous Huxley to the New World Order

It is essential to read 9/11 and Event Covid as closely related, if not a continuation. In this context it's notable how many people refer to Aldous Huxley's Brave New World as a blueprint. It was such, in more ways than one.

Just as the Behavioural Insights Team is proving central to the rollout of Event Covid in the Five Eyes countries, it's useful also to look at the history of neurochemical manipulation. Project MK-Ultra grew out of the Tavistock Institute's research on traumatized soldiers after WW1. What began with treatment for PTSD, became a quest to build the resilient soldier, and soon morphed into efforts to manipulate the masses to support war -- or at least, not to resist it.

Aldous Huxley helped run MK-Ultra. It is revealed in his letters, Psychedelic Prophets: The Letters of Aldous Huxley and Humphry Osmond, which show he played a key role building the 'scientific dictatorship' he had envisioned.

These social constructionists control all sides of the debate: the research itself; the implementation; and the cultural programming of the population, through novels, movies and music. That's possibly why Aldous Huxley wrote Brave New World.

Another example: The author of The Search for the Manchurian Candidate, John Marks, was the assistant to the director of the Bureau of Intelligence and Research for the U.S. State department.

A letter from Aldous Huxley in 1957, to Humphry Fortescue Osmond, an English expatriate psychiatrist credited with inventing the word psychedelic. Huxley asks Osmond to prepare for a visit to Huxley in California by Louis Jolyon West. Along with Sidney Gottlieb, West was one of the architects of MK-Ultra.

"I suggested to him [West] that he should hypnotize his people before they take LSD and give them post-hypnotic suggestions aimed at orienting the drug-induced experience in some desired direction. And also with the desirable goal of enabling subjects to recapture the LSD experience by purely psychological means...." [NLP]
"It may be that the unconscious can be persuaded by means of post-hypnotic suggestions, repeated if necessary again and again, to open the door without the aid of chemical keys...."
"It would be a great thing if you could get down to Florida to supervise at least the initial phases of the work."
Aldous Huxley.

What Huxley is telling Osmond is to go to Florida to supervise MK-Ultra Sub Project 43.  The words "to open the door" refer to a concept that Huxley titled, The Doors of Perception, in a book published in 1954. The book in turn lent its name to the band, The Doors, a decade later.

In another letter to Osmond, Huxley writes:

”While Julian [Huxley's brother and founding head of the United Nations' educational, scientific and socio-cultural arm, UNESCO] was here we went to UCLA to see the rats and cats and monkeys with electrodes stuck in various parts of their brains.
"They press a lever which gives them a short, mild electric shock and the experience is so aesthetically wonderful that they will go on at a rate of 8,000 stimulae per hour until they collapse from exhaustion, lack of food and sleep.
"We are obviously getting very closer to reproducing the muslim paradise where every orgasm lasts 600 years."

The Tavistock Institute has been pushing this agenda since WW1. It is structured as an institute so that it can apply its insights to any institution: civil service, military, corporations.... and that has happened with increasing frequency since the 1990s to the present day.


UnSpun 029 – “Aldous Huxley and Spies in Academic Clothing”


All Along The Watchtower and other government tricks

The cross-border regime that brings us the modern Security State is deeply occult. No, not just the Nazis and Thelema. It's a lot more spooky than you think.

Just as an aside, how many people know that Aleister Crowley was employed by Britain's Secret Intelligence Service and was busy in Berlin from 1930 to 1932 as Hitler was rising to power? Hardly surprising that Berlin should attract him but, right place, right time.

The cryptocracy, at its simplest, is the observation that the elite empower themselves by hoarding knowledge, and denying it to those they control. In the same way the elite schools today still teach the classics, the philosophers and techniques of government down the ages, building in their children the mindset of ruler. Knowledge for them and ignorance for the rest.

Until the Enlightenment, people understood the concept of all that is seen and unseen, the latter belonging to the metaphysical, the religious and the occult (simply meaning that which cannot be seen). After the Enlightenment the people were increasingly driven into specialized labor while a ruling elite retained to itself the "unity of knowledge".

This was the background to one of the great police states: Elizabethan England, in which the population was forbidden to think or live in terms of the world to which they had been born. A massive recalibration of the popular mind was in order. Queen Elizabeth I was guided by four top officials: her spymaster Walsingham, the bureaucratic master manipulators William and Robert Cecil, and her mystic John Dee.

Spook: 1/ to make frightened or frantic : scare especially : to startle into violent activity (such as stampeding) 2/ a ghost or one who treads lightly behind the scenes 3/ a spy or servant of the cryptocracy.
Spookery: matters relating to spies and espionage  : to concoct  and carry out deceptions.
Witchery: to mezmerize, stupify, entrance, brainwash, hypnotize or control the mind.
Witch: medium, medicine man, conjuror, necromancer.

The three elements of government: spying (in manu occultatum, the hidden hand), bureaucratic manipulation (amalgamation) and mysticism (Kabbalah, Fremasonry, alchemy) are far more consistent elements of government than most people think.

The mystic element is employed at each stage: in the gathering, interpretation and misrepresentation of information; which is then subject to amalgamation through the bureaucracy; with the result being alchemy, or the turning of base human matter into gold or, yet more desirable, even irresistible: transcendent power.

In his 16th-century writings John Dee (with Edward Kelley) claimed that angels had revealed the Enochian magic -- the key to the Book of Enoch.

No not Enoch Powell, a controversial British politician but also one of the few great intellects to sit in Parliament in recent times. He is connected to our story. His reputation was hammered by the reaction to his insightful but wholly unprophetic Rivers of Blood speech in April 1968, which largely observed the blood flowing at that time in the United States (MLK had been assassinated earlier that month, JFK five years before, and RFK would follow within two months). Enoch Powell saw the fault lines and that people in power were deliberately provoking an earthquake. He was calling out the deep state. They crucified him politically).

John Dee didn't call it Enochian but Angelic magic. It was the Freemasons of the 20th century who revived Dee's work and called it Enochian, blending it with the Hermetic Qabalah.

It has given us powerful social and political movements, from the Thelemic and Rosicrucian to the Wicca, which is said to have adepts at the summit of politics.

Occult insight has been tightly bound with the most powerful forms of government - from the Freemasonic foundations of the United States, the secret geometry of Washington DC, the occult passions of the the founders of NASA reflected in its emblematic chevrons, to the LSD mind-bending experiments of the Tavistock Institute and CIA that closely mimic the journeys along the astral plane in which western occultists recorded their psychic experiences in a scientific manner.

Perhaps they desire to Enochulate the rest of us.

They are not open about their intention. How could they be, a government founded upon cryptocracy? Yet they give us more than hints: the information is merely disguised.

Who gave us Flat Earth Theory -- and then had the chutzpah to laugh at us? Flat Earth thinking preoccupies the powers that be more than we commonly assume. Don't be a pedestrian thinker: it doesn't need to be literal. As a way of seeing, it is a handy way of guiding their actions.

Their working model of the Earth IS flat. It has to be. It's a board game, Monopoly combined with Risk and Watchtowers and Ouija to add some more dimensions. They don't have to go to their dying bed actually believing that the Earth is flat. The just treat it as so. Their Corporatist Media throws it out there, seeds the public mind with Flat Earth Theory and then laughs at us.

'We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out." -- attributed to Karl Rove.

From the four Watchtowers of the Great Table (they are actually truncated pyramids with flat tops giving them five exposed sides) represent the totality of all existence and the furthest extent of being: ideas, conceptions; physical manifestation; emotion and reaction; wisdom and integration.

See how this is a metaphor for government: it maps quite well the process from the formation of information, the amalgamation of bureaucracy, the interpretation or refinement, and the ultimate goal of alchemy or wisdom.

Each of the ruling Watchers oversees a "Watchtower" and plays a role in the process of unifying the government. Call it a new order, a new world, whatever you like it amounts to the same.

"There must be some kind of way out of here,"
Said the joker to the thief
"There's too much confusion
I can't get no relief.
Businessmen, they drink my wine
Plowmen dig my earth
None of them along the line
Know what any of it's worth."

"No reason to get excited,"
The thief, he kindly spoke.
"There are many here among us
Who feel that life is but a joke.
But you and I, we've been through that
And this is not our fate
So let us not talk falsely now
The hour's getting late."

All along the watchtower
Princes kept the view
While all the women came and went
Barefoot servants too
Outside in the cold distance
A wild cat did growl
Two riders were approaching
And the wind began to howl.

-- All Along The Watchtower by Bob Dylan (1967).

More follows.


Lockdown is the Elite Panicking at Loss of Control

Event Covid represents hysterical panic by the banker-led technocracy. It is a panicked response to the buckling and tottering of their failing international institutions. They have bankrupted Europe, America and Japan and have lost ability to control economies.

Corporations no longer pay taxes. In the U.S. they account for 5% of Federal tax receipts. Global corporations decided they no longer need nation states, except when they smell subsidies or a bailout. That's left governments looting what remains of the middle class and having to magick up fake currency for their day-to-day operations.

The endless wars have allowed corporations to grab resources while subverting the international order and building a lawless world in which money and mercenaries talk loudest. The same people who call for the International Institutions of World Government are the same people who have destroyed government after government: Not just Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria but they've cannibalized their own United States, European Union and Japan.

Amid this rubble, organized crime is flourishing. Not the uneducated hoodlum arm twisting a contract from local government. The elite-schooled, entitled, networked organized criminal whose family and associates include lawyers, bankers, politicians and tech or defense contractors - but who is every bit as committed to the idea of The Family. These people don't kill, blackmail or sit around in political meetings - they pay people to do that for them.

Central bank organized crime is having a problem collecting on the debt. Tax is no longer the money-spinner it once was. The monetary system is imploding. The bankers have to resort to periodically pumping and dumping the economy in order to grab assets from government and people. That system is the root of their control.

What happens when a system based on convention and social contract collapses? For the bankers to maintain their privileged position, they must seek direct control - the right to issue digital money but more important (since money is already largely digital) the right to track that money at every stage of its journey and snip off a few percent each time it changes hands. Even better, to direct most of that money into the more productive slaves via a system of social credit scoring.

Event Covid is the result: lockdown, under the excuse of infection and the need for mass injection, the marking and numbering of all the people so that the banking beast can track them.

Trouble is the system's not ready. The Artificial Intelligence is not ready. The police and military are still human. Their hastily-imposed medical martial law is creaking and unevenly applied. The public isn't fully buying the need for lockdown or vaccine.

The first victims are those countries targeted by organized crime for their weak institutions and easy manipulation. That's the developing countries. Even in countries like India, however, the bankers, the international agencies and their corporate front men have struggled to implement their socio-monetary control, except in a totalitarian system like China.

In the West the public has the Internet. It's a race against time to repress the people before they get wise to the game. Hence sudden and very obvious extension of censorship.

The Corporatist Media gives it away. If the public was compliant and brainwashed, the Media would be able to maintain the polite myth of a diverse conversation.The fact that CNN screams like a shrill teenager with his crotch caught on a barbed wire fence - is because that's what's happened. The desperation is telling.

These wannabe global leaders are inadequate. Politicians are predictably pathetic. It's the pretensions of technocrats that alarm. They seem to believe they can build their Technocracy on the fly, if only they get us all clamped down and pliant. If there are competent leaders among the Technocrats and the Bankers I cannot see them. Central bankers from around the world met at Jackson Hole and proposed "Going Direct" in August 2019. There have been few pronouncements since. Will they stand up and, if not, why not?

Even on an institutional level the corrupt EU and UN, flail about, apparently taking their orders from the Rockefeller Foundation's Lockstep document (2010) and the World Economic Forum's fancy PowerPoint presentation of a Global Reset.

Government by PowerPoint. You never knew Bill Gates had a plan for you.

"It all depends whether you people want to save your freedom as much as these people want to enslave you. Everything these people have planned for 60 years could come unglued almost overnight if a significant percentage of the people understood what the con game is all about. We can destroy these conspirators before they destroy us. We can do it if we move fast enough and hard enough." -- Gary Allen, None Dare Call It Conspiracy.


Power Doesn't Care About The Label Fascist Or Communist

Ideologies are a ten a penny. You only hear about ones they put money behind. There are loads of theorists, think tanks and scriptwriters. It's the producer that matters. Mr Moneybags. Without him you don't have a show.

Power sets up the political system, not the other way around. Yes, there are belief systems and theorists and grass roots politics but there is plenty of evidence that Big Label Political Systems and the Ringmasters are controlled by Big Money.

It should not even need stating.

Power exists outside of politics. There was power when it used religion rather than political ideology to control people. There was power before there were parties. There was power before there were parliaments. There was power before there were nation states.

The first consideration of power brokers should be, 'what system of rule do we want?'
The second consideration should be, 'how do we disguise our influence so that system upholds our interests while not revealing our hand, so that the system is not compromised by the people's discovering our presence behind the curtain?'
The third consideration is our golden share: 'how do we pull the plug if we need to shift things in a new direction?'

The Founding Fathers of the U.S. followed this pattern. Power created the political system, not some latter day Moses slipped the Constitution by God.

Personal investment in any particular ideological theory doesn't change this. It's the same diversion that goes by the twin names of politics and sports.

It doesn't matter if Benito used pitch for the Blues (back when Blues were reds) before he joined the Reds (who were... err) because the games are rigged anyway.

In fact the Blues (who were really reds) had this thing called Progressivism and they really loved Benito, even when he started calling himself a literal fascist. With the war and all, that got problematic and the Blues had to drop the Progressivism label for a while and become Liberals. But now they've brought back the Progressive label just as we enter the 1920s.. sorry, the 2020s. Once again there's this fascist thing and they're selling tickets to watch the show under the same old billing, Progressivism. And they're buying it.

No cheap shot intended. I am simply illustrating how power strategies are marketed. Power is a manifestation of specific interests with particular aims. These aims are partly revealed and partly hidden. The part that's revealed is marketed to the public under a label, usually with an adjective, or adjectival noun, to make it sound futuristic, trending, technocratic or progressive.

The totalitarian system that is being locked down is fascist because it it corporatist, but it borrows elements from its siblings, the variants of communism.

The ideology that gave birth to those systems is not Hitler's nor Marx's. It belongs in large part to those who gave board and lodging to those scriptwriters and published their works, and who paid to put on the show. Those same financial interests also financed Trotsky and Lenin and financed the Chinese state in ways we don't yet know.

This is not hidden. The tax-exempt Foundations write about it all the time. The Corporations (the foundations are just their shop windows) have been active in shaping all the major political shows -- the wars and the political systems that result.

Their minutes show they've been working to the same script since at least 1910. Before that it appeared in several variants, all related, like chapters of a book. Cecil Rhodes wrote one chapter, the Freemasons around the French Revolution wrote another, the Rothschilds wrote one, as did the early Illuminists around Jacob Frank, then there's a chapter by Francis Bacon and so on.

Think of Power as the Editor of this book. This is not one single movement or club but there are consistent threads. Ultimately, however, nothing happens without the Producers, Mr Moneybags, who puts up the money for the show.

Why does the theme music to American politics sound funny? All that Looney Toons and balloons at the party conventions? Because if you want a share of the limelight in the Big Tent you have to join the circus.


The New Normal Will Change Music

What’s next for cultural programming?

Is Covid and social distancing the death blow to Electronic Dance Music?
If Festivals join my No No Square, then who, what, where?
What do the CIA and social engineers have in store for the next counter cultural youth movement?

Music's Got The Bug - Billboard lists the cancelled festivals and concerts

 EDM afficionados see soft drugs and music forming a consciousness-expanding musical movement, one world, one love. All the references to mind control and a New World Order are ironic.
 From outside, it’s a capitalist, computer-generated commodity in 57 Varieties of same-but-different; the beat and chord progression feed dissociative processes, which are the same in spiritual trance as a military march. With laser shows projecting globalist symbolism, it’s a form of mind control.
 Critical thinkers see parallels with the Counterculture and LSD… claiming to expand minds while focusing on the self; psychotropic drugs; corporatist control behind the youthful smiles. The likely role of the CIA in creating the Counterculture has been documented by authors like Dave McGowan and Tom O’Neill, Neil Sanders and Mark Devlin.

Fade to Black
 EDM relies heavily on festivals for its revenues, which is how DJs earn their income. But their pay has been falling for several years now. The International Music Summit said by 2018, EDM had already shrunk to just 3% of the music market in the US in 2018.

Yet it remained the face of popular music, heavily promoted by the Corporatist Media. Until now.
Is the Corporatist Media preparing us for the the next shift in popular tastes?

 Suddenly EDM is not progressive: The grievance industry has taken aim at the gender-imbalance in EDM: Fewer than one-in-10 DJs is a woman. BLM may finally kill off the fashion for feathered headdress so popular among the festival crowd.

 Billboard – Gay Black Men Helped Create EDM. Why Do Straight White Men Dominate It?
 EDM Struggles: White DJ Goes Black Face, Calls Himself ‘Slave’
 Insomniac – Women Produce 9% of Electronic Music
 Chicago Tribune – EDM is a big, lucrative world, but not for women DJs
 Ebay – Indian Headdress For Sale

 But the real damage is economic – to the bottom line:
 DMN – DJ Earnings Plunge to a Five-Year Low as EDM Revenues Continue to Slide
 NPR – The Mainstreaming Of EDM And The Precipitous Drop That Followed
 Esquire – Coronavirus Might Kill The Music Industry. Maybe It Needed To Die
 ABC – Tasmanian live music industry in crisis as COVID-19 clampdown rolls on
 Music Week – MixMag Pauses Print Edition
 MixMag (2015) – Is the EDM era finally coming to an end?
 MixMag (2020) – Will coronavirus really collapse the live music industry?
 The Diplomat – Can Wuhan’s Punk Scene Survive the Coronavirus?
 UNESCO – https://en.unesco.org/news/culture-covid-19-impact-and-response-tracker

EDM Has Shaped Social Media and Advertising

Lest you think I over estimate the influence of EDM in social engineering, see how social marketers use it. If EDM has changed social marketing, it has changed the political and cultural communication as well. You can be sure that the Behavioural Insight Team and their the influence agencies have taken notice.

EDM fans tweeted a staggering 11 times per day (roughly six times more than the average Twitter user
A whopping 1 in 4 social posts about EDM occur during a live electronic music event.
Source: The Social DNA of EDM Fans

EDM is a channel to push a message. "The social media practices perfected by pop, EDM and major corporations like Coca-Cola will eventually find their way into more obscure music circles."
Source: Assessing Social Media's Impact on Electronic Music

“I think with the advent of fashion, alcohol and other complementary products and or services, which marry in with music, that is starting to drive and upskill brands and artists, individually and collectively, to start to work together more to achieve a common goal.” -- Eamon Chiffey, Electronic Music Conference.

 Eventbrite found that social media conversations about EDM are predominately positive, with love of EDM accounting for 40 percent of all social media conversations.
Source: EDM Fans’ Hyperactive Social Media Use Driving Genre’s Success (Study)

EDM's strength and now its weakness is that social contact is an essential part of the fun. It's about being there. Without the festival, the social media presence will fade. If I interpreted the above research correctly, somebody is watching this musical space very closely.

So what next, in music – or popular culture in general?


The Wartime Spirit of the Blitz and Brainwashing the Masses

The modern Ministry of Information often seeks to revive WW2 folk memory. The psychiatric evidence is that Blitz spirit does not so much “strengthen resolve” as induce helplessness and obedience. 

Cynthia Chung uncovers the method behind the madness - and the frequent evocation by the British government of wartime spirit - through the work of British psychologist William Sargant and its accurate representation in popular format by George Orwell in this article: https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/08/how-to-take-back-control-of-your-mind/

William Sargant “British psychiatrist and, one could say, effectively the Father of “mind control” in the West” studied the heavy bombing of London and its impact on the citizen's mind. Rather than creating a “can do” spirit, people coped by recognizing their helplessness. The healthy and normal, in Sargant’s view, remains functional in a ever-changing environment (see the article above).

As Chung puts it, the best survivors had the best potential for brain washing. You brainwash the strong, not the weak. The higher up the food chain, the more brainwashed. So that as Orwell observed, “It is precisely in the Inner Party that war hysteria and hatred of the enemy are strongest.“

Sargant recognized that those who didn’t co-operate could be eliminated: “…the stake, the gallows, the firing squad, the prison, or the madhouse, are usually available for the failures”.

In the 1910 minutes of the Carnegie Foundation’s Endowment for International Peace, the trustees asked themselves “if there is any way known to man more effective than war to so alter the life of an entire people”. They concluded there was not.

Scheme of a V2 Rocket by U.S. Army. Public domain.

Given that Hitler was a joint Anglo-American-German project, it does make you wonder if the V2 campaign wasn’t itself a psycho-social experiment. The British government certainly studied it as such. The British conducted their own psychological experiment on Dresden: it was intended from the start to induce mass terror.

Is the drone of incoming bombers more terrible than the silent plunge of a rocket? How does the mass bombing of cities compare with the terror of random elimination?

The V2 rocket scene from the movie of the novelist Graham Greene's The End Of The Affair -  with Ralph Fiennes, Julianne Moore. Greene's answer to the trauma of war was to not to submit to fear, but others would say that as an establishment writer and an Mi6 man, his appeal to God is still consistent with the State's concept of the just war.

During the First World War the Zeppelin raids killed relatively few people. The British government saw the public’s tendency to shelter in Underground stations as a lack of resolve (Wilfred Trotter) and planned to draft police and troops to control the expected mass exodus from the capital.

People appeared more pragmatic in WW2. Few people bothered to carry gas masks by spring 1940. That September the German bombing campaign against the United Kingdom known as the Blitz took place, lasting through May 1941.

Yet what happened during the air raids was that traumatized civilians simply stayed in their homes, often in bed. Absenteeism at factories after air raids rose to 15 per cent. [1]

It was at this point that government propagandists created the Blitz Spirit and the culture of the stiff upper lip (the part of the mouth that tends to sweat and tremble under pressure). Aubrey Lewis (1942) was commissioned to write a report showing that those who broke down had prior stress-related illness. Other psychologists not writing reports-to-order, said the effect of stress would be delayed. “A national survey of mental health services conducted in 1943 by Dr C.P. Blacker found that many directors of psychiatric clinics believed that ‘latent neurosis’ existed in the civilian population.” [1]

A different impact on the public mind was had by the V1 Doodle Bug flying bomb and the V2 Wernher von Braun rocket campaign in 1944. Once their engines cut out the rockets were silent as they plunged earthward. The V2 rockets could leave a crater 20 meters wide and eight meters deep.

V2 hits Whitechapel, east London, March 27, 1945, killing 134 people. Imperial War Museum non-commercial licence.

The government initially blamed the sudden blasts on rupturing gas mains. “The Germans themselves finally announced the V2 on 8 November 1944 and only then, on 10 November 1944, did Winston Churchill inform Parliament, and the world, that England had been under rocket attack “for the last few weeks”.”

Von Braun’s experiments were undoubtedly monitored by the U.S. and Britain. He was one of the first recruits under Operation Paperclip. The British government lost out on von Braun but got its share of the hardware, under Operation Backfire.

The British Ministry of Information (1939-45), Orwell's MiniTrue, by An Siarach in the public domain

Sadly I can’t access the following document because I’m not a librarian –
Effect on home morale of flying bombs and V2 rockets: reports, minutes and correspondence (1944) published by the Ministry of Information (Themes   Information Services and Propaganda, Bombing and Attacks on the Population; Subthemes: Damage to property, Public opinion and morale, Casualties and injuries, Psychological impacts, Rumours and gossip)

The impact on unseen terror from the air continued: The carpet bombing of Dresden after the Allies had won the war was an acknowledged attempt to terrorize the population. Government psychologists descended hungrily on the surviving human meat. I would like to write about that but the technical jargon is impenetrable. For internal use only, I suppose.

As for the British, broken mentally by two devastating wars within 20 years, they were never allowed to heal, except in a field hospital, permanently reliving the war (with the unspoken threat of the next one - remember the nuclear war public information films?). That's the purpose of thrusting the Blitz into everyone's face, relentlessly.

After WW2 freedom for Brits was just to be alive. To have anything to eat. Of course many people on the continent experienced much worse. But note that rationing was deliberately prolonged in Britain until 1954, almost a decade after the end of the war.  Conscription continued until 1960, with the last cohort completing their National Service in 1963.

Psychological austerity. Deliberate repression. Sapping much of their sense of humour - Britons have been changed by a mental-psycho-social-economic attack that's been waged against them since the Second World War. The recent censoring of the 1970s series Fawlty Towers shows that Britons are now being denied even humour, a cathartic way to dealing with trauma. John Cleese's joke, "Don't mention the war," is now to be taken literally by comics, presumably to leave government propagandists with exclusive rights to mention the war, relentlessly.

Generations have been subjected to a propaganda machine that has gradually narrowed their understanding of what freedom is. In Britain, freedom is a choice between Strictly Come Dancing and The Great British Bake Off... and in case you missed it on TV, the British press never tires of telling you about those same television shows day after day, year after year.

Tea dances and cake bake-offs could not be a more obvious throwback. Bringing the nation together. Sure. Circa 1945.

It treats the public mind - an arena that should be alive to the sights and sounds of new music and arts, humour and national self-reflection - like a demented spinster to be entertained with an ancient ritual in an attempt to keep her synapses engaged.

Americans were more insulated from WW2. They still understood freedom was to eat what you wanted, to educate your children as you wished. Aspire to wealth, spiritual and material. Then U.S. society also came under attack.

Since the Phoenix Program was brought home from Vietnam, Americans have seen the gradual expansion of Homeland Security, with the potential to offer Americans many of the features and amenities enjoyed by the Viet Cong (See Douglas Valentine). War, it seems, is always conducted with one eye to reshaping the domestic population.

Don't worry about it. Think about slavery instead. The focus on slavery diverts the search for atonement past the democides that happened within the lifetime of our relatives – to events safely beyond the historical horizon. War will be used to manipulate the masses – but responsibility for war, unlike that for slavery, will not be a matter for the public to debate.

[1] Air raids and the crowd – citizens at war. The British Psychological Society.
Edgar Jones explores how British people responded to air raids during the Second World War, and what this tells us about coping under extreme stress. https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-29/june-2016/air-raids-and-crowd-citizens-war

[2] Sargant talks about Christianity and mind control BULLETIN OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PSYCHIATRISTS, VOL 11, SEPTEMBER 1987 In Conversation with William Sargant (PDF)


Corporations Take Over - NWO Now Comes In Two Flavors

We are entering an era in which corporations shape the world in their own image. We still see national or regional resistance but we must understand who is resisting. The European Union “opposes” U.S. corporations because it answers to its own.

First, we must be honest about origins. The EU is thoroughly corporatist, that is to say it exists primarily to benefit corporations. They fix boundaries for policy and have dominant political and economic influence (just compare the “rights” of individuals with the rights of corporations under EU rules).

The “Commission” is a faceless bureaucracy, appointed, not elected. The “Parliament” is purely advisory and has no power. Policy is made behind the scenes. It is a lobbyist’s dream. Unlike the U.S. Congress, it does not even pretend to represent the people.

When Britain’s minister for technology Tony Benn went to Brussels eager to get his hands dirty shaping European industrial policy, he was met with blank stares. The decisions had already been made and the ministers were just there for show.

Corporatist first (and primarily German – note who’s kept their manufacturing base) the EU then set up a mechanism to deliver customers to the hungry corporations at its core.

The Euro was set up as a wholly artificial monetary system (the right to create money without control over taxes and spending – no European treasury, because Germany would not cede that control: it just wanted to flood Europe with credit) offering unsustainably-low interest rates to countries like Greece and Ireland, leading to credit booms. Result: Greece and Ireland had the highest rates of Mercedes Benz ownership in the world.

Magically, we were told, the wealth would somehow “equalize” around Europe. Reality: Germany had an export boom, financed by German, French and Austrian banks – who made loans to customers who lacked the wealth or fiscal discipline to sustain such borrowing. When those customers defaulted, the banks got bailed out by European taxpayers. Wealth was sucked from periphery to core.

To simplify the money thing: to borrow and be sure of paying it back, you must be wealthy or have tight control over your spending. Germany has both. Greece has neither. When the Euro system lowered interest rates to levels that were sustainable for Germany, they were always going to distort the economy of Greece. The Euro Gnomes knew that from the start. No deception was required on the part of the Greeks or Italians or Irish or Spanish or Portuguese.

From a German Perspective: This was always the plan. Consider if WW2 had not happened. Britain had already appeased German companies who wanted access to cheap Czech labour and resources. Chamberlain would have offered Poland next.

European mega companies (German-Franco-Belgian, there was always a French industrial-political lobby that sought to unite with Germany. See France: The Dark Years, 1940-1944, by Julian Jackson) would have got access to cheap Eastern European labour, along with natural resources and markets.
Fast forward some decades and western European countries are complaining that they are competing with cheap Czech and Polish migrant labour – that must ring a bell to the most plugged British ears. The goal has been achieved, hasn’t it?

War is the continuation of politics by other means “and nothing to get hung about”. However,  it’s risky and expensive. Better to rise above borders than drive tanks through them. European corporations now roam freely across the continent, getting access to cheap labour and resources. Note that the EU treaties give far greater freedoms to corporations than to individuals.

From the U.S. perspective: The Wilsonian Plan was a Europe strong enough to be a trading partner but not a rival. So Germany has freedom of action within wide bounds so long as it does not threaten the US.

Why does the European Union stop at Russia? Because with Russia it would become a much more important world power. Friedman (was it Thomas or George?) says what US has always feared is a German Russian rapprochement – like at Rapallo (1922) and the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact (1939). When Germany and Russia get together the world trembles.

In 1948 the U.S. established The American Committee for a United Europe, chaired by William Donovan, founder of the OSS. “Funding came from the Ford and Rockefeller foundations as well as business groups with close ties to the US government.

“All along, the CIA-run front group was funding the so-called European Movement.” Founder J√≥zef Retinger, the lawyer Robert Schuman who was one of the first to lay out the narrative of the destruction of Jews, and the former Belgian prime minister Paul-Henri Spaak, “were all treated as hired hands by their American sponsors” .

A memo from the European section, dated June 11, 1965, advises the vice-president of the European Economic Community, Robert Marjolin, to pursue monetary union by stealth, suppressing debate until the “adoption of such proposals would become virtually inescapable”.  https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/1356047/Euro-federalists-financed-by-US-spy-chiefs.html

The end goal of unifying Europe under a single regime, then, was to eventually build a transatlantic union merging the United States with the European superstate. In fact, that is the very same agenda envisioned in Obama’s extraordinarily unpopular “Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership,” or TTIP, with the EU. https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/23120-the-real-agenda-behind-the-cia-spawning-the-eu

From a European Perspective: Where does this go?
The mismanagement and corruption of the European Union was enough to justify Brexit – but that does not rule out a U.S. motive.
Possible drivers: Driver One: TTIP was failing. Perhaps split off Britain to join a new NAFTA.
Driver Two: The Climate Change Project had run into the buffers politically. The 2009 Copenhagen Climate Change Conference was a failure. Credibility had collapsed. U.S. evangelist Michael Mann of the hockey stick had been thoroughly discredited in court. U.K. evangelist Phil Jones had been exposed for falsified data and bullying peers.

Even though lots of money was being made — from emissions taxes, carbon credit trade, and subsidies for recycling so-called green projects, from lithium batteries to solar panels — the Climate Change Project had collapsed as a political force for social engineering.

Driver Three: The Zion Hub: Rebuilding the NWO around the U.S., Britain and Israel – the founders and funders of the Zionist project, who are in turn heavily controlled by the Zionists. Germany and the Reich played a big role in creating Israel but a) that conflicts with the Holocaust narrative so German leadership is a no-no b) Germany has its own destiny and is always cast in the role of antagonist.

This brings us full circle to the question: who is driving The Great Reset? My money is on a combination of all three drivers, leaning towards the third, but with pushback from a fourth.
We are seeing a German-French-UN-Chinese bloc pushing for a worldwide order — competing with the Anglo-Zionist-WEF hub who believe they can build a cybernetics and systems approach to government based around Israeli technology. Thus a new nexus of power is being constructed; but it is facing resistance from the eastern globalists.

For all the talk of a Fourth Reich, there is a split. The Nazi & Zionist interests that worked together in Germany (Transfer Agreement, Stern Gang) is now firmly embedded in the U.S.-British-Israeli bloc.

German politicians, controlled since WW2 through the CIA-Gehlen/BND, who opposed closer ties to Russia, are on the back foot. German business has always believed the realization of its potential lies in the east: huge markets containing the raw material and labour upon which Germans can work their undoubted technological and bureaucratic skills. Now corporations are in the driving seat, pushing their rival versions of a NWO.