Why Aren't Other Billionaires Angry With Bill Gates?

Note, Feb 2021: It's since become clear that billionaires conspired to get rich off the Lockdown. This was written at the beginning.

Why are the other business leaders letting Gates cost them billions? Bill Gates has led efforts to shut down the global economy, furloughing their workers. The oligarchs should be seeking to hang Bill Gates from the rafters of his $140 million Seattle mansion. Would they let the Gates' forge ahead like this if they were not in agreement?  Clearly they are in agreement. We know they have been bailed out. The oligarchs like Jeffrey Preston Jorgensen Bezos are profiting mighty. Is Bill Gates compensating the other billionaires from his own pockets? No. The Fed is doing it at our expense.

What is the Gates family doing if not vying for dominance? What are the possible outcomes if not control? If it is just a question of public health, why Bill Gates? He is not a doctor. If he were you or me, he would be called a quack. Do those who rally behind politicians ask themselves why a private billionaire is running health policy?

Now a real expert: In the most low-key, considered way Charlotte Iserbyt lays open the way familial and business networks control America. "Interlocking power centers and foreign policy initiatives of controlled conflicts, always funding both sides, leading always in the direction of total control... Evidently they believe that the elite will survive and live very, very well."

She talks about Anthony Sutton, whom she knew, and her father, a Skull and Bonesman. She quotes Jim Marrs: "If one does not have Sutton's information they will never truly understand America's history or foreign policy.... It is an essential primer for tracing the families, bloodlines and business entanglements of America's secret establishment" - Jim Marrs on

Iserbyt quotes a study commissioned by the Carnegie Foundation to change American education from factual learning, history and science to the type of education we have today. Compiled by the American Historical Association, it is called Investigation of the Social Studies in the Schools. Prof Harold Laski said of this report, "At bottom and stripped of its carefully neutral phrases the report is an educational program for a socialist America."

Even more important is the testimony of Norman Dodd, investigator for U.S. Congressman B. Carroll Reece's Special Committee on Tax Exempt Foundations, of 1953. Congress was responding to public complaints about changes to education. It was one of the last times Congress was actively pro-American, says Iserbyt.

The investigators got to examine the minutes of  the trustees of the Carnegie Foundation's Endowment for International Peace, which have since been stowed away. These revealed that in 1910 the trustees asked themselves "if there is any way known to man more effective than war to so alter the life of an entire people".  After a year of head scratching they concluded there was not. Consequently they said "we must control the diplomatic machinery of the U.S. by first gaining control of the State Department", according to the report.

WWI had already pushed women out of the home and into the war factories. "The trustees had the brashness to congratulate themselves on the wisdom and validity of their original decision," wrote Dodd.

The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace wrote to President Wilson "asking that the war be not ended too quickly." After the war they reasoned that if they could get control of education, they could prevent a return to the pre-war way of life - thereby cementing the changes brought by war.

Carnegie sought the help of the Rockefeller foundation to alter the teaching of American history, awarding grants, fellowships and scholarships to professors who would rewrite American history, promoting humanism, one-worldism and socialism.

By the 1930s this resulted in the Investigation of the Social Studies quoted above. The Reece committee concluded that between 1933-36 there had been a non-bloody revolution. That a few foundations had funded efforts to change the beliefs of the American people through education and propaganda. Thirdly, that people had changed their beliefs without resistance.

We have left a phase of laissez-faire economies and moving inexorably to monopoly capitalism and collectivism, concludes Iserbyt.