It's been more than a year since "two weeks to flatten the curve", the fortnight of shelter-in-place that we were assured would contain the spread of Coroni. Yet the mantra continues, with tweaks like 0.3%-different variants creating excuses for new bans on travel.
YouTubers and bloggers point out the inconsistencies but an army of behavioral psychologists goes to work on the fear porn through the state-corporatist media and the majority, it seems, comply.
How long will it take for momentum to build to the point where the public hold politicians and bureaucrats to account? Polly St George has a clue: this could go on forever because we're reinventing the wheel.
She was part of a group of alt-media researchers that was recently banned. New researchers popped up in their place... but they've gone back to the beginning.
This has gone on for decades. Researchers collect the best evidence, refine their arguments, build on each other's work, develop networks and support each other. They exist as a deeply researched repository of information supporting lawyers and activists.
Then, every so often, the powers that be (TPTB) sweep those researchers off the board and a new crowd of faces emerges.... and begins the long task of educating themselves and the public.
"We're in this constant cycle where so long as we are chasing the laser pointers and asking the same old questions that's fine. It even serves TPTB because the truth confuses and terrifies some people. The moment you get too much momentum, however, TPTB wipe the slate clean, do their smear campaigns or impose strict censorship.
It's really frustrating to see the new crop starting out again at square 1, 2 or 3. You get the sense that this cycle will never end. Many people are willing to accept a few fundamental truths: that this is not incompetence. Yet they can't see this is a long-term, predatory way of operating that has been going on since before WW1."
This raises the question: who is behind it.
Recently I watched an analysis of the origins of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, focusing on his childhood, including the beatings he says he received at school and separate, perhaps unconnected, evidence of sexual predation of children which led to one of his masters being imprisoned.
The analysis is partly the work of two videographers who call themselves Sheep Farm Studios and it's an attempt to examine the inner workings of BoJo. He is undoubtedly a troubled man who has caused, and is causing, a lot of trouble to others. It cites the blatant bigotry of Johnson's writing, his frequent sacking, the verdict of former bosses that he lies and is unreliable and it concludes that Johnson regards himself above the law. The question is the origin of this psychology.
The video makes clear that if Boris Johnson was facing death on the scaffold, by axe or guillotine, he'd escape. Not only that but you’d blink and he’d have snagged the job of executioner, his straw chaff hair poking out beneath the black hood, his droopy features grinning.
Every time he screws up there is always someone ready to rescue "Boris" (real name Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson) from his mistakes and to give him another job at an even higher salary. Is that because someone is guiding him as a golden boy, someone who is using him to advance their own plans or — seemingly just as convoluted — do psychopaths look out for each other?
This article will go on to explore how psychopaths do indeed recognize each other and work together. It's not simply them against us. Psychopaths are aware they are damaged and they try to reorder the world so that it gives them the 'justice' they deserve in their own minds.
Compared with that explanation, the 'golden boy' theory is quite simple, isn't it? Occam's razor might say that given Johnson's wild ways, someone is probably promoting him for their own purposes.
It seems clear that Johnson is what the mafia call a made man, "an associate first must be Italian or of Italian descent and sponsored by another made man. An inductee will be required to take the oath of omertà, the Mafia code of silence and code of honor" (Wikipedia). When we look at his father Stanley Johnson, he seems to have the same strange coincidence of a wayward character and ever-upwards career trajectory.He had six children, while writing books about population control, had jobs with the World Bank and the European Commission, and worked closely with Rockefeller representatives like Maurice Strong on environmental issues. His grandfather was an Ottoman radical journalist, Ali Kemal, (son of Haci Ahmet Riza Efendi of Kalfat, near Ankara) and his great-great-grandfather, the founder of the YMCA, George Williams.
Given the Rockefeller connection, that points to a level of consistency that is thinly-disguised by a change of nationality and name: a YO! Sushi conveyor belt of macaroons… any colour you like, same ubiquitous aroma of bitter almonds.
You can see the Sheep Farm Studios video series here: Sheep Farm 10 | Meet The Flockers | PM Boris Johnson Ep.1/3
and here Sheep Farm 11 | Meet The Flockers | The Johnson Gang Ep.2/3 and here Sheep Farm 12 | Meet The Flockers | Boris’s Ex-Wives & Girlfriends 2.5/3.
PONEROLOGY — STUDYING THE ORIGINS OF EVIL
Polly looks at evil and power, as researched by Andrzej Łobaczewski (1921-2008). In Political Ponerology: A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes (1998) he says that early brain injuries or abnormalities can lead people to behave in a pathologically evil manner.
This made me think of Sheep Farm Studio's video of Boris Johnson's early life. Whatever defects he may have inherited there was enough abuse in British boarding school life to warp his mind.
Psychopaths work as a group because they know they are outsiders. They are aware of their differences and resent them. On the other hand their sense of honour bids them to cheat and undermine the broader world. They feel and act distinctly and recognize this in their own kind. They develop their own laws and customs and they try to impose these on the world.
They regard other people as weaker than themselves because we are burdened with a conscience and because we make excuses for their behaviour. They know their personalities traumatize others and they learn very early how to use this.
In the psychopath, a dream emerges like some Utopia of a “happy” world and a social system which does not reject them or force them to submit to laws and customs whose meaning is incomprehensible to them. They dream of a world in which their simple and radical way of experiencing and perceiving reality would dominate; where they would, of course, be assured safety and prosperity.
In this Utopian dream, they imagine that those “others”, different, but also more technically skillful than they are, should be put to work to achieve this goal for the psychopaths and others of their kin. “We”, they say, “after all, will create a new government, one of justice”
They are prepared to fight and to suffer for the sake of such a brave new world, and also, of course, to inflict suffering upon others. Such a vision justifies killing people, whose suffering does not move them to compassion because “they” are not quite con- specific. They do not realize that they will consequently meet with opposition which can last for generations.
Subordinating a normal person to psychologically abnormal individuals has severe and deforming effects on his or her personality: it engenders trauma and neurosis. This is accomplished in a manner which generally evades conscious controls. Such a situation deprives the person of his natural rights: to practice his own mental hygiene, develop a sufficiently autonomous personality, and utilize his common sense. In the light of natural law, it thus constitutes a kind of crime – which can appear at any social scale, in any context – although it is not mentioned in any code of law.
Essential psychopathy has exceptionally intense effects in this manner. Something mysterious gnaws into the personality of an individual at the mercy of the psychopath and is then fought like a demon. His emotions become chilled, his sense of psychological reality is stifled. This leads to de-criterialization of thought and a feeling of helplessness, culminating in depressive reactions which can be so severe that psychiatrists sometimes misdiagnose them as a manic-depressive psychosis.
Many people rebel against a psychopathic domination much earlier than such a crisis point and start searching for some way of liberating themselves from such an influence.
They gain control says Łobaczewski through a form of natural selection. The good people suddenly realize the environment is toxic and they leave. The psychopaths impose new hiring practices until it becomes a complete takeover. Entire institutions come under their control in government and civil society, charities and NGOs.
"Oxfam and Amnesty, human rights bodies, anti-corruption campaigns, the media, the economy, even the justice system, are Potemkin institutions at this point. The facade is there. Anyone who doesn't look closely will be fooled by the buzzwords, pretty web sites and the spokespeople repeating their mantras.
Now they say look at all these corrupt organizations... we must replace them with The Great Reset and social justice and equity! And look at all the corporations: they're all on board.
Any time people a group of people get close to pushing down the cardboard cutouts and the facade, we get wiped off the map. Then the whole process of discovery begins again."
Polly's video, A Small Number of Psychopaths Control Society, starts @09:00 minutes
http://thephaser.com/2021/04/a-small-number-of-psychopaths-control-society/
Comments